Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Beatrice Stagno vs Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Stagno vs Elkin analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Beatrice Stagno vs Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Stagno 0 - 0 Elkin
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Stagno has won 37.38% of points on their second serve, while Elkin has won 41.3%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Stagno, in recent form, has won 58.36% of their opponent's second serve points, while Elkin has won 54.12%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.92% and 36.35% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Stagno has saved 47.62% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Elkin has saved 47.57% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Stagno has won 38.24% of matches played (W/L 13/ 21), with Elkin winning 33.33% (W/L 14/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Stagno has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 18/ 21), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4). Elkin has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 16/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Stagno has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 41.38% of matches (W/L 12/ 17), where as Elkin has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 36.36% of matches (W/L 12/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Stagno has played against opponents with an average rank of 164.53 while Elkin has played against players with an average rank of 94.86.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Stagno has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Elkin has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Stagno has converted 47.41% of breakpoint opportunities, and Elkin has converted 50.72% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
Form
40% (48-71)
Career Total W/L
36% (27-49)
35% (7-13)
YTD W/L
38% (10-16)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Beatrice Stagno vs Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Stagno VS Elkin
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Beatrice Stagno | Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 35% (7/13) | 38% (10/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 35% (16/30) | 41% (24/34) |
| Games Win/Loss | 42% (181/248) | 47% (227/260) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 35% (6/11) | 42% (5/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 42% (5/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 17 | 24 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0.61 |
| DFs Total | 79 | 144 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:48 | 1:18:50 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 180.5 | 77.27 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (753/1165) | 57% (757/1326) |
| 1st Serve W% | 55% (415/753) | 59% (450/757) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 37% (154/412) | 41% (235/569) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (64/135) | 51% (70/138) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (523/1176) | 43% (552/1281) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 43% (9/12) |
| Futures W/L | 35% (6/11) | 20% (1/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 37% (7/19) | 38% (10/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 33% (2/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 60% (5/3) | 83% (12/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 40% (5/2) | 17% (12/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (15/4) | 0% (14/0) |
Beatrice Stagno Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Beatrice Stagno
74%
(
76 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
10
54%
(
41 of
76)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
51 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
99
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michika Ozeki
Player
Beatrice Stagno
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Beatrice Stagno
Player
Verena Meliss
59%
(
59 of
100)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
121)
1
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
11
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
74)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
14 of
47)
38%
(
8 of
21)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
47%
(
47 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
63 of
121)
116
Total Points Won
105
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Beatrice Stagno
Player
Lucia Tognoni
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Jamshidi
Player
Beatrice Stagno
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naima Karamoko
Player
Beatrice Stagno
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve %
55%
(
12 of
22)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
11 of
17)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
42%
(
11 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
27
Total Points Won
21
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
Player
Beatrice Stagno
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Merna Refaat
Player
Beatrice Stagno
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Beatrice Stagno
Player
Anna Kubareva
65%
(
70 of
107)
1st Serve %
59%
(
62 of
105)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
15
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
12 of
43)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
48%
(
51 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
55 of
105)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mina Hodzic
Player
Beatrice Stagno
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jahnie Van Zyl
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
49%
(
44 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Isabella Kruger
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
Player
Ekua Youri
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Saumya Vig
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
18
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
34%
(
12 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
51%
(
40 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 6-2 12-10 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zoe Hitt
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paris Corley
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
Player
Sabastiani Leon
52%
(
36 of
69)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
41%
(
13 of
32)
1st Serve %
38%
(
17 of
45)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
8
77%
(
10 of
13)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
10 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sarah Victoria Majesty Nita
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
46%
(
32 of
69)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
59)
-
Aces
-
10
Double Faults
13
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
34)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
49%
(
34 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Stagno Vs Elkin Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Stagno are available here and Elkin photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
